Skip to content

Home

Thailand’s banking sector is undergoing rapid digital transformation, driving growth in core banking software investments. Core banking software refers to the back-end systems that process daily banking transactions and manage accounts. Globally, this market is expanding at roughly 9–10% annually, reaching an expected $21.6 billion by 2030 (Core Banking Software Market to Reach USD 21.61 Billion by). In Thailand, growth is similarly robust as banks modernize legacy systems and new digital banks prepare to launch. According to PwC, most Thai banks have struggled to meet digitalization goals due to outdated, monolithic core systems that are costly and inflexible (Most Thai banks fall short of digitalisation goals, PwC Thailand says). This has created a strategic imperative to upgrade core banking platforms.

Market Size and Growth: While specific local figures vary, industry analysts estimate Thailand’s core banking software segment in the hundreds of millions (USD), with high single-digit to low double-digit percentage growth per year in the 2023–2025 period. This trajectory aligns with global trends fueled by digital banking and cloud adoption (Core Banking Software Market to Reach USD 21.61 Billion by). The table below provides an illustrative estimate of market size:

Year Est. Core Banking Software Market (Thailand) Annual Growth
2023 ~$140 million (estimated)
2024 ~$155 million (estimated) ~+10% YoY
2025 ~$170 million (forecast) ~+10% YoY (Core Banking Software Market to Reach USD 21.61 Billion by)

Table: Estimated core banking software market in Thailand, 2023–2025 (figures approximate, assuming ~10% CAGR in line with global market growth (Core Banking Software Market to Reach USD 21.61 Billion by)). The overall banking IT spending in Thailand has been on the rise, and core system modernization constitutes a significant share of these investments. Multiple Thai banks have publicly announced large IT budget increases dedicated to core banking upgrades and digital platforms. With consumer demand for better digital experiences and pressure from fintech competition, Thai banks are accelerating core transformations to improve agility, reduce costs, and support new digital products.

Key Core Banking Software Vendors in Thailand

Thailand’s core banking market features a mix of established international vendors and newer cloud-native entrants (“neo-core” providers). Traditionally, large Thai banks relied on tried-and-tested core systems from global firms or in-house systems. Today, a range of vendors – from legacy platform providers to fintech disruptors – are vying for market share:

Vendor & Origin Category Notable Usage in Thailand (Examples)
Sunline (China) New cloud-native core Selected by SCB (Siam Commercial Bank) in 2024 to modernize its core banking system (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). Sunline’s platform will revamp SCB’s deposit and loan processing with improved scalability and efficiency.
Infosys Finacle (India) Modern core suite (traditional) Implemented for Line BK, the KASIKORNBANK–LINE Corp digital bank venture, supporting deposit and lending products (KASIKORN LINE achieved significant financial inclusion with embedded finance). Finacle also has a history in Thailand (e.g. EXIM Bank’s core system) and is known for its robust functionality.
Temenos (Switzerland) Traditional global core & wealth platforms Used by Kiatnakin Phatra Securities for a new wealth management platform in 2023 ([Thailand recent news
Silverlake Axis (Malaysia) Regional legacy core provider Supplies core banking systems to various ASEAN banks, including some in Thailand. For example, Silverlake’s platform was implemented at SME Development Bank of Thailand (Silverlake Core Banking Implementation for SME-Development ...). It has a long history in the region, though facing new competition from cloud-based systems.
10x Banking (UK) “Neo-core” cloud-native platform No announced Thai clients as of 2025. However, 10x’s next-gen core banking platform (the SuperCore) has attracted major banks globally (e.g. Westpac and JP Morgan’s Chase UK have selected it ([Building the future of core banking with 10x Banking
Thought Machine (UK) “Neo-core” cloud-native platform No known deployments in Thailand yet. Thought Machine’s Vault core is used by digital banks in Asia (for instance, Standard Chartered’s Mox in Hong Kong) and has backing from Thai investors (SCB’s venture arm participated in its funding). It’s a prominent competitor in the cloud core space (Success Of New-School Vendors Shows That Lean Core Banking Is ...).
Mambu (Germany) SaaS cloud core (API-driven) Not yet adopted by Thai banks, but active in Southeast Asia. Mambu’s SaaS core banking is popular with fintech lenders and digital-only banks regionally. Thai digital finance firms or upcoming virtual banks are likely evaluating such solutions to launch quickly with low infrastructure overhead (Success Of New-School Vendors Shows That Lean Core Banking Is ...).
Oracle FSS (USA) Traditional core (Flexcube) Oracle’s Flexcube system has been used by some Thai banks historically (e.g. certain modules at Bangkok Bank). While not recently publicized in Thailand, Oracle remains a competitor, especially for large banks modernizing from older Oracle/i-flex platforms.
FIS / Fiserve (USA) Traditional core (emerging cloud offerings) These U.S. vendors have limited footprint in Thailand’s retail banking but are expanding cloud availability. For instance, FIS’s core banking platform became available on Azure in Thailand (ANZ New Zealand selects FIS for core banking upgrade). They mainly serve international banks or niche Thai segments.

Table: Major core banking software providers and their role in Thailand. The competitive dynamics show a two-pronged market:

  • On one side, incumbent core vendors (Temenos, Oracle, Finacle, Silverlake, etc.) have established relationships and localized functionality, but they often run on older architectures.
  • On the other, “neo-core” cloud players (10x, Thought Machine, Mambu, etc.) offer modern, API-driven systems that promise faster product launches and lower IT costs (Success Of New-School Vendors Shows That Lean Core Banking Is ...). These new entrants are gaining attention as Thai banks look to leapfrog to cloud technology. For example, Forrester Research notes that “new-school vendors such as 10x Banking [and others] enable quick transformation” with lean, cloud-native cores (Success Of New-School Vendors Shows That Lean Core Banking Is ...).

Vendor Selection Trends: Thai banks are increasingly open to non-traditional vendors if they meet local requirements. A notable example is SCB choosing China’s Sunline over more established Western vendors, signaling that performance, flexibility, and cost are key decision factors (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). Meanwhile, global vendors are tailoring their offerings (e.g. Temenos’ SaaS model, Oracle’s cloud version) to stay competitive. The next section explores how banks are adopting these solutions.

Both incumbent banks and new entrants in Thailand are actively upgrading their core banking infrastructure:

  • Large Domestic Banks: Thailand’s top banks (e.g. SCB, KBank, Krungsri, Bangkok Bank) have begun multi-year core modernization projects. Siam Commercial Bank (SCB), the country’s oldest bank, announced a major core system overhaul in 2024, partnering with Sunline to replace its decades-old core (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). SCB’s new core will handle deposits and loans with improved efficiency, stability, and scalability to support surging digital transaction volumes (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). The bank’s CEO noted this modern core will let SCB “quickly offer tailored solutions and seamless experiences” to customers (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade) – a competitive necessity in the digital era. The integration is expected to take four years, positioning SCB as a “full-fledged digital banking” leader by project completion (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). Other large banks are observing SCB’s progress closely. It is anticipated that Bangkok Bank, Krungthai Bank, and Kasikornbank (KBank) will evaluate similar core replacements to stay competitive (these banks still run on heavily customized legacy cores).

  • Mid-Tier and Specialized Banks: Midsize institutions and state-owned banks are also upgrading. Kiatnakin Phatra Financial Group (which includes KKP Bank and Phatra Securities) recently adopted Temenos for wealth management tech (Thailand recent news | FinTech Futures), a step toward integrating modern core modules. Government banks like the Government Savings Bank (GSB) and Government Housing Bank have issued tenders for core system upgrades as well, aiming to improve service delivery. Niche players such as the SME Development Bank implemented a new Silverlake core to better serve SME lending (Silverlake Core Banking Implementation for SME-Development ...). These projects illustrate an industry-wide push: even banks outside the top-tier see core modernization as crucial for efficiency and future growth.

  • Foreign Bank Branches: Foreign banks operating in Thailand (e.g. Standard Chartered, HSBC, MUFG via Bank of Ayudhya) typically rely on their regional or global core systems. For instance, Bank of Ayudhya (Krungsri), majority-owned by Japan’s MUFG, leverages some MUFG systems alongside local solutions. These foreign banks often upgrade in sync with their group’s technology roadmap. As an example, when MUFG globally upgrades core platforms, Krungsri adapts locally. Notably, Krungsri has embraced cloud-based analytics on AWS to complement its core (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). Standard Chartered’s Thai operations are relatively small, but the bank’s global strategy (investing in cloud-native cores like Thought Machine for its digital banks) could influence its Thai branch in the future. Overall, foreign banks tend to modernize through global platforms but must also comply with Thai regulations (e.g. data localization), which could drive them to use local cloud regions for any core banking components hosted off-premise.

  • In-House Development vs Packages: Thai banks historically built many custom systems around their core (especially front-ends and middleware). Kasikornbank (KBank), for example, through its tech arm KBTG, has developed extensive digital banking applications internally. However, building an entire core in-house is rare due to complexity. The trend now is platform partnerships: banks like KBank augment core capabilities by integrating with fintech solutions (e.g. KBank’s LINE BK venture uses Finacle’s core engine (KASIKORN LINE achieved significant financial inclusion with embedded finance) rather than an in-house system). This indicates a preference for packaged core solutions that can be heavily customized, rather than starting from scratch.

Digital-Only and Neo-Bank Adoption

Thailand’s digital banking landscape is heating up, especially with new virtual bank licenses on the horizon. This is influencing core banking software choices in two key areas:

  • Digital Banking Units of Traditional Banks: Several incumbent banks have launched digital-only offshoots that operate on modern tech stacks separate from the legacy core. A prime example is LINE BK, a mobile-only bank launched in 2020 as a joint venture between KBank and LINE. LINE BK runs on a cloud-ready core (Infosys Finacle) that supports real-time services via the LINE messaging app (KASIKORN LINE achieved significant financial inclusion with embedded finance). In its first year, LINE BK acquired over 2.5 million users by offering quick account opening and loans within the chat app (KASIKORN LINE achieved significant financial inclusion with embedded finance) (KASIKORN LINE achieved significant financial inclusion with embedded finance) – something made possible by the flexibility of its modern core. Another example is TMRW by UOB, a digital-only banking service UOB introduced in Thailand (and the region) targeting millennials. TMRW leverages a cloud-native architecture and advanced analytics (UOB built this platform with various fintech partners). These digital subsidiaries demonstrate how Thai banks are piloting new core technologies on smaller scale before wider rollout. Their success (e.g., high customer uptake and faster product launch cycles) is making the case for broader core transformation in the parent banks.

  • New Virtual Banks (2024–2025): In a landmark move, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) announced it will issue licenses for virtual banks – branchless, digital-only banks – for the first time. Official guidelines were released in March 2024, with applications accepted through September 2024 (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow) (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow). The BOT’s aim is to increase competition and reach underserved segments via digital channels (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow). By 2025, up to three new virtual banks are expected to be licensed and preparing to launch. These new entrants (likely consortia of tech firms, telecom companies, and financial institutions) are unencumbered by legacy systems, so they are poised to adopt cutting-edge core banking platforms from day one. Indeed, across Asia’s virtual banks, a common pattern is the use of cloud-native core systems (for example, Hong Kong’s virtual banks mostly run on modern cores like Thought Machine or Mambu). We anticipate Thailand’s virtual banks will follow suit – selecting agile, scalable core platforms that can be deployed in the cloud. This will likely benefit neo-core vendors: a virtual bank startup is more inclined to choose a SaaS or API-driven core for speedy implementation. Additionally, the BOT’s licensing requirements emphasize technology capability and innovation (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow), implicitly encouraging applicants to have strong fintech partnerships. In summary, the arrival of virtual banks in Thailand is a catalyst for core banking innovation, as these newcomers will set a high tech benchmark that may spur incumbent banks to accelerate their own core upgrades.

Regulatory Factors Influencing Adoption and Innovation

Regulation in Thailand’s banking sector plays a pivotal role in core banking system decisions. Key regulatory and policy factors include:

  • Virtual Bank Licensing Framework: As noted, the BOT’s introduction of virtual bank licenses is a game-changer. The rules for virtual banks stipulate no physical branches, a focus on financial inclusion, and use of technology to reach underserved customers (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow). The licensing framework (2024) requires applicants to demonstrate robust tech infrastructure and digital service delivery capability (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow). This pushes both new entrants and existing banks (who may partner or compete with them) to invest in state-of-the-art core systems that can fulfill these requirements. By opening the market to new players, regulators are increasing competitive pressure – forcing all banks to innovate or risk losing ground. The BOT explicitly wants virtual banks to “strengthen the competitiveness of Thailand’s financial sector” (Latest Updates on Virtual Bank Business Licences in Thailand | Global Regulation Tomorrow), indicating regulatory support for modern, efficient banking platforms. We should expect regulatory scrutiny on the core systems of virtual banks (for security, reliability, etc.), but also a willingness to approve cloud-based and outsourced models, as long as risk is managed.

  • Data Residency and Cloud Compliance: Thai regulators historically required sensitive financial data to be stored onshore or within controlled environments. This influenced banks to keep core banking systems in local data centers. However, regulation has evolved to accommodate cloud usage. The BOT has issued guidelines that allow banks to use cloud services (including public cloud) for certain operations, provided they implement proper risk controls and the regulator is notified. One major concern has been data residency – ensuring customer data remains in Thailand’s jurisdiction. The upcoming local AWS region directly addresses this: “the new AWS Asia Pacific (Bangkok) Region will enable customers with data residency preferences to securely store data in Thailand.” (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore) This development aligns with government policy (the “Cloud First” initiative under the national digital plan) (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). Regulators, including the BOT and the Ministry of Digital Economy, have shown support for cloud adoption as long as compliance is met. In fact, Thailand’s Prime Minister welcomed AWS’s investment, noting it “strengthens our national infrastructure” and aligns with plans to make Thailand a regional digital hub (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). In practical terms, this means banks can now consider running even core banking workloads on public cloud infrastructure without violating data localization rules – a significant shift likely to accelerate cloud-based core systems.

  • Security and Operational Resilience Requirements: The central bank imposes strict standards on banks’ IT systems, particularly core banking, to ensure stability of the financial system. These include guidelines on uptime, disaster recovery, and cybersecurity. When adopting new core platforms (especially cloud or SaaS cores), banks must demonstrate to regulators that these systems are secure and can maintain service continuity. This has led to some cautious, phased approaches to core migration. Nonetheless, modern core providers have been actively working with regulators – e.g., by obtaining security certifications and setting up local support – to ease these concerns. Regulatory audits and sandboxes are commonly used in Thailand for new tech deployment. For example, a bank might run a new core in parallel for a while or launch it under a “sandbox” approval before full rollout, to satisfy operational risk checks. Overall, regulatory emphasis on stability means core banking transformations in Thailand are carefully planned with oversight, but regulators are not blocking innovation; rather, they are ensuring it’s done safely.

  • Open Banking and Fintech Integration: While Thailand has not mandated open banking (as in EU’s PSD2), the regulator and government encourage banks to collaborate with fintechs. There have been industry-led standards for Open APIs under the Thai Bankers’ Association, and BOT has signaled interest in data-sharing frameworks to boost innovation. This indirectly influences core systems – banks are looking for core banking platforms that easily integrate with third-party services and APIs. The ability to plug into ecosystems (e.g., payment wallets, budgeting apps, or regional cross-bank QR payment networks) is increasingly important. Any regulatory moves towards formal Open Banking would further push banks to modernize cores for better connectivity. In 2022, Thailand and Vietnam launched a cross-border QR payment linkage (Thailand recent news | FinTech Futures), and Thailand’s PromptPay real-time payment system is expanding; these initiatives require cores that can handle real-time, API-based transactions. Banks with flexible, modular core systems will adapt to such regulatory-driven innovations faster.

  • Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA): Thailand’s PDPA (enforced from mid-2022) imposes data privacy requirements similar to GDPR. Banks must ensure customer data is handled with consent and protected. Legacy core systems often struggle to implement granular data controls or anonymization, whereas newer core platforms have more built-in compliance features (for example, better audit trails, encryption, and consent management). Thus, PDPA compliance has been another factor nudging banks to upgrade systems or enhance their core’s data management capabilities. Additionally, PDPA concerns made some banks initially hesitant about cloud (due to data control), but with proper agreements and local cloud regions, this hurdle is diminishing.

In summary, regulation in Thailand has become an enabler of core banking innovation, not just a gatekeeper. By opening the market to digital banks, endorsing cloud infrastructure, and prioritizing financial inclusion, Thai authorities are creating an environment where banks feel the urgency and have the permission to transform their core technology.

Impact of the AWS Thailand Cloud Region on Banking

One of the most significant recent developments in Thailand’s tech landscape is the arrival of a local AWS (Amazon Web Services) cloud region. This has direct implications for banking infrastructure modernization and digital banking:

  • Local AWS Region Details: AWS announced it will launch the AWS Asia Pacific (Bangkok) Region by early 2025, investing an estimated ฿190 billion ($5 billion) in Thailand over 15 years (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). This is AWS’s first full region in Thailand (following regions in Singapore and Indonesia in ASEAN). A local region means AWS will operate data centers physically within Thailand, offering the full range of cloud services on Thai soil. Crucially, this allows banks to use AWS cloud while keeping customer data and workloads in-country. AWS notes that Thai customers with data residency requirements will be able to store data locally and achieve lower latency for their applications (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore).

  • Bank Adoption of AWS Cloud: Even before the official region launch, many Thai banks and financial institutions have been leveraging AWS via its Singapore region or using services like AWS Outposts. Major banks have publicly partnered with AWS for digital initiatives. For example, Siam Commercial Bank has worked with AWS on advanced analytics and was one of the early Thai banks moving some workloads to cloud. Krungsri (Bank of Ayudhya) is “advancing its digital transformation by leveraging AWS” for data analytics, machine learning, and to optimize operations across the group (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). Krungsri’s Head of IT stated that AWS is their “strategic cloud provider” and a local region will “significantly expand the possibilities” of AWS’s partnership with the bank (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). Similarly, Kasikornbank’s tech arm (KBTG) has embraced AWS. KBTG’s CTO described building on AWS as “game-changing” for innovation, citing AWS’s breadth of services and scalability (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). He noted that with the new AWS region, KBank expects to further improve network latency, data synchronization, and security, thereby delivering even better services to customers (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore).

  • Modernizing Infrastructure: The presence of a local AWS region accelerates core banking modernization in two ways. First, it removes a key barrier – banks can now host core banking applications or core-adjacent systems (like digital banking platforms, payment gateways, APIs) on AWS cloud without breaching BOT regulations on data location. This is likely to increase cloud migration for core systems that were previously kept on-premises. Banks can gradually shift parts of their core (for example, customer databases, microservices for specific products) to AWS and take advantage of cloud scalability. Second, AWS’s rich toolset (containers, serverless, AI services, etc.) enables banks to re-architect core applications for cloud, rather than just doing a like-for-like migration. For instance, a bank might break a monolithic core into microservices and deploy them on AWS for greater agility. The new region offers low-latency connectivity, so even banks that keep the primary core in their own data center might use AWS as a hybrid cloud for backup core systems or surge processing capacity.

  • Digital Banking and Innovation: Digital-only banks and fintechs stand to benefit greatly from the AWS region. They can run fully in the cloud with confidence that performance for local customers will be fast and reliable. Lower latency is particularly important for real-time banking transactions, fraud detection, and mobile app responsiveness. The Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) already noted it uses AWS for a high-volume trading platform and looks forward to the local region to expand low-latency data offerings for investors (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore) (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore). In banking, a similar effect is expected: things like real-time payments, mobile banking, and AI-driven services (chatbots, personalized offers) will all improve with local cloud infrastructure. Moreover, AWS’s investment comes with training and ecosystem building. AWS is working with Thai partners (e.g. local IT firms, consultancies) and training talent (New AWS Region in Thailand to launch by early 2025 - About Amazon Singapore), which means more resources available for banks to execute cloud projects. This ecosystem effect reduces the risk and cost for banks switching to cloud-based cores.

  • Competitive Dynamics (Cloud Providers): While AWS is currently in the spotlight, other global cloud providers are also focusing on Thailand’s banking sector. Azure and Google Cloud do not yet have Thai regions (as of 2025), but they have increased engagement with banks via local partnerships and cloud nodes (e.g., Azure has a local “edge” location, GCP offers Bangkok sites via partners). The AWS region launch may spur competitors to consider Thai data centers as well. From a bank’s perspective, the AWS region gives AWS a significant edge – it’s likely many Thai banks will deepen ties with AWS for core and digital banking projects. That said, banks typically adopt a multi-cloud strategy for resilience and bargaining power. We might see core banking workloads distributed across clouds or kept portable. For instance, a bank could run its core banking on AWS but use Azure for Office productivity and certain risk apps. The key point is that AWS’s heavy investment validates the cloud-first approach in Thai banking. It sends a message: cloud is now a safe, accepted part of critical banking infrastructure in Thailand, rather than just for peripheral services.

In conclusion, the AWS Thailand region is catalyzing a shift in how banks think about their IT infrastructure. It has effectively aligned regulatory, technological, and market forces in favor of cloud-based core banking modernization. Thai banks can now innovate on par with global peers, using cloud-native core systems and cutting-edge services, all while meeting local compliance. This development is expected to accelerate digital banking offerings and perhaps even enable entirely cloud-native banks in Thailand in the near future.

Competitive Dynamics and Outlook

The competition in Thailand’s core banking software sector is intensifying, driven by both vendor rivalry and the strategic moves of banks:

  • Race to Modernize: With clear regulatory support and evident consumer demand for digital services, Thai banks are in a “race” to modernize core systems. Early movers like SCB may gain an advantage in agility – for instance, being first to market with new products that a modern core enables (rapid account opening, real-time personalization, etc.). Fast followers are likely; other large banks will not want to be left with a reputational image of having the “old, slow system.” We can expect competitive announcements in the next year: e.g., another top-5 bank revealing a core replacement project or a partnership with a cloud provider for core banking. Banks are also benchmarking against regional competitors: Singapore and Malaysian banks have been modernizing, so Thai banks feel pressure to keep up regionally.

  • Vendor Competition: The core banking vendors themselves are competing vigorously for Thai deals, knowing that a wave of replacements is coming. Traditional vendors are leveraging their local experience – for example, Temenos and Oracle can point to decades of Thai language and regulatory support in their systems – while new vendors leverage success stories and cost benefits. The case of Sunline winning SCB’s core contract highlights that even a less familiar name can win if it meets the bank’s needs (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). This has likely alerted Western vendors to up their game on pricing and cloud readiness. Additionally, Chinese and regional tech firms (like Sunline, Huawei’s fintech arm, and Silverlake) represent new competition with potentially lower costs. On the other hand, Western neo-core providers (10x, Thought Machine, Mambu) may try to enter via partnerships or pilots with the upcoming virtual banks or smaller firms first, then scale up. We might see joint ventures or alliances form – for instance, a global vendor teaming with a local IT services firm to reassure banks on local support. Everyone is aware that once a major bank picks a core system, that vendor is locked in for many years, so each deal is high-stakes.

  • Innovation vs. Risk: Competitive dynamics also revolve around how boldly each bank moves. Adopting a cutting-edge core early (innovation) has to be balanced against the execution risk. Some banks might take a more conservative stance, waiting to see proven results from others. However, there’s a cost to waiting: running a legacy core yields higher IT costs and can impede launching new features. Competitively, a bank that delays too long could lose younger customers to more nimble rivals. The likely scenario is a staggered approach – a few leaders overhaul their cores by 2025, others follow by 2026–2027. Those that move slowest might find themselves forced into action if they start losing market share, especially once virtual banks begin operations. In any case, all banks are modernizing in some form; the difference is speed and scope.

  • Customer Experience as a Differentiator: Ultimately, the core banking system upgrade is a means to an end – delivering superior customer experience and products. We see Thai banks positioning their digital capabilities as part of their brand. For example, SCB’s slogan “Digital Bank with Human Touch” emphasizes combining tech with service (Thailand’s SCB taps Sunline for core banking upgrade). Banks are competing on who can offer the most seamless mobile banking, the fastest loan approval, the most personalized insights – all of which trace back to core system capabilities. As core upgrades take effect, we’ll likely see feature-based competition intensify: offering things like 24/7 instant loan disbursements, fully digital onboarding, multi-currency accounts, etc. Banks that have modern, flexible cores can iterate these offerings quickly. Those on older cores may struggle or have to create complex middleware workarounds. Thus, in the next 2–3 years, one could see a divergence where tech-savvy banks pull ahead in service innovation, pressuring others to catch up technologically.

  • Consolidation and Partnerships: Another dynamic to watch is industry consolidation or partnership. If some banks find it too costly or risky to transform alone, they might seek partnerships. There is precedent in other countries of smaller banks pooling resources for a shared core banking platform (sometimes via their association or a fintech provider). In Thailand, where the top five banks dominate ~80% of the market, smaller banks might band together for technology if needed to compete. Alternatively, bigger players might acquire smaller ones partly to absorb their customer base and modernize them on a single core. We have already seen consolidation like TMB merging with Thanachart Bank (forming TTB) – and post-merger, a unified core system was needed. Competitive pressure could thus indirectly drive more consolidation, as banks with superior tech capabilities become more attractive partners (or more formidable competitors).

Outlook: By 2025, Thailand’s core banking software market is expected to be markedly transformed from just a few years prior. We will likely see at least one or two major banks live on new core platforms (or in advanced migration), the first virtual banks gearing up with fully cloud-based cores, and possibly even a foreign digital bank entering via partnership (for example, an international fintech could team with a Thai firm under the new licenses). The market size will continue to grow as banks invest heavily in software licenses, cloud infrastructure, and integration projects. Growth forecasts remain strong – double-digit expansion – as both license sales and ongoing subscription revenues (for cloud/SaaS cores) accumulate.

Competition among vendors will probably yield benefits for banks in terms of better pricing and more innovative features. Banks, in turn, competing for customers will push the envelope on what their core systems can do, driving further innovation by vendors – a virtuous cycle. Regulators are expected to maintain a pro-innovation stance, while keeping an eye on systemic risks. All signs point to Thailand’s core banking systems becoming more modern, agile, and cloud-enabled over the next couple of years, supporting a vibrant and competitive banking sector.

References and Sources

泰國核心銀行市場趨勢與展望

隨著數位轉型的推進,泰國銀行業正快速升級其核心系統。核心銀行軟體指的是支援每日交易與帳戶管理的後端系統。根據全球預測,核心銀行軟體市場的年成長率約為 9–10%,預計到 2030 年將達到 216 億美元。在泰國,數位銀行興起與金融科技競爭激烈,使得許多銀行將現代化核心系統列為優先策略。

市場規模與成長(估計):

年度 泰國核心銀行軟體市場規模(估算) 年成長率
2023 約 1.4 億美元
2024 約 1.55 億美元 約 +10%
2025 約 1.7 億美元 約 +10%

資料來源:全球研究機構估算,依全球市場趨勢推導。

泰國各大銀行已陸續宣佈提升 IT 預算,強化數位與核心系統建設,以因應市場對快速、彈性、高可用性的數位體驗需求。


主要核心銀行軟體供應商

供應商(來源地) 類型 泰國應用情況
Sunline(中國) 雲原生核心系統 獲選為 SCB(暹羅商業銀行)新的核心平台供應商【2024年】。
Infosys Finacle(印度) 現代化核心平台 為 KBank 與 LINE 合資的 LINE BK 提供核心系統。
Temenos(瑞士) 全球知名傳統核心 為 Kiatnakin Phatra 證券提供財富管理核心平台。
Silverlake Axis(馬來西亞) 區域性老牌供應商 SME 發展銀行等使用其系統。
10x Banking(英國) 雲原生「新核心」 尚未進入泰國,但已被 JP Morgan、Westpac 採用。
Thought Machine(英國) 雲原生核心 雖未於泰國部署,但其 Vault 核心被亞洲多家虛擬銀行使用。
Mambu(德國) SaaS 核心 尚未在泰國落地,但東南亞區域應用廣泛。
Oracle FSS(美國) 傳統 Flexcube 系統 曼谷銀行部分歷史模組採用。
FIS / Fiserv(美國) 北美供應商 在泰國使用有限,雲產品逐步擴張中。

採用趨勢分析

本地銀行

  • SCB:2024 年開始核心系統大規模更換計畫,預計歷時四年完成。
  • KBank:旗下的 LINE BK 採用現代核心(Infosys Finacle),為快速產品上線提供彈性。
  • Krungsri(Bank of Ayudhya):MUFG 持股,與 AWS 合作資料分析平台,顯示對雲轉型的重視。
  • TTB、政府銀行:中小型銀行也逐步替換核心系統,以提升效率和合規性。

外資銀行

  • 一般使用集團全球核心系統,或區域標準平台進行本地客製整合。
  • 受惠於 AWS 泰國區域,雲端部署選擇更具彈性。

數位銀行與新進業者

  • LINE BK、TMRW:為本地銀行創建的數位子品牌,使用現代核心系統加速上線與創新。
  • 虛擬銀行:2024 年 BOT 宣佈將開放虛擬銀行牌照(預計發出最多 3 張),預期將採用如 Mambu、Thought Machine 等雲原生核心,無需傳統重資本投入。

法規與市場驅動因素

虛擬銀行政策

  • 2024 年 BOT 頒布虛擬銀行框架,強調金融包容性、數位創新與風險控制。
  • 對核心平台要求高安全性、高可用性與合規能力。

資料本地化與雲端合規

  • AWS 宣佈 2025 年在曼谷開設本地資料中心,符合 BOT 對資料駐留的要求。
  • 雲服務的合規性提高,銀行可逐步將核心業務轉上雲端。

開放 API 與 PDPA 法規

  • 雖未強制開放銀行政策,但銀行協會已倡議開放標準 API。
  • PDPA 法上路後,對核心系統的資料管理與審計功能要求更高,促使銀行汰換無法合規的舊系統。

AWS 曼谷雲端區域的影響

  • 支援本地部署需求:銀行可安全將客戶資料與交易邏輯部署在 AWS 泰國區域內,符合監管要求。
  • 合作案例:SCB、Krungsri、KBank 均已與 AWS 展開合作進行資料、AI 與數位平台建設。
  • 加速雲端核心的採用:有助於銀行採用如 Thought Machine、10x、Mambu 等支援 AWS 雲的核心系統。

市場競爭與未來展望

  • 競爭白熱化:核心系統更新成為銀行搶佔數位優勢的戰場。早期佈局者(如 SCB)可能建立明顯領先地位。
  • 供應商競爭激烈:新興的雲核心(如 Sunline、10x、Thought Machine)與老牌供應商(如 Temenos、Oracle)競相角逐大型合約。
  • 以客戶體驗為差異化:擁有現代核心系統的銀行能快速推出創新功能(如即時放貸、無人臨櫃開戶、個人化理財建議),建立數位領先品牌。
  • 潛在整併與共享核心平台:中小銀行可能透過聯盟、外包或共享平台降低轉型成本。

小結

到 2025 年,泰國核心銀行市場將見證以下關鍵轉變:

  • 頂級銀行中至少有一至兩家完成核心系統替換或進入最後階段;
  • 三家虛擬銀行正在以雲原生核心進行部署準備;
  • 雲端成為主流選項,AWS 的本地化加速了部署信心;
  • 供應商間的競爭推動價格下降與創新加速,銀行轉型意願明顯提升。

Globalization in the Post-Trump Era

In the wake of Donald Trump’s presidency, the landscape of globalization has undergone a profound transformation. While the machinery of international trade and cooperation still grinds on, its underlying values and leadership dynamics have fundamentally shifted. Regardless of one's view on Trump’s domestic policies, there is little doubt that his tenure has left a deep and lasting imprint on the global order.

Once admired for its cultural appeal, democratic ideals, and global stewardship, the United States has seen its soft power significantly eroded. If George W. Bush exposed the limitations of hard power—military interventionism—then Trump dismantled America’s soft power. The respect and trust that had once enabled the U.S. to guide global norms gave way to skepticism and, at times, ridicule. Joseph Nye, who coined the term “soft power,” recently warned that Trump’s actions—such as slashing cultural diplomacy programs and politicizing institutions like Voice of America—have made it harder for the U.S. to inspire admiration or emulate its values abroad.

Trump’s foreign policy was unapologetically transactional. “America First” became more than a slogan—it became a doctrine. Gone was the spirit of multilateral cooperation. In its place was a strategy of bilateral deal-making, often with an eye toward exploiting power asymmetries. Smaller or poorer countries, lacking leverage, were strong-armed into agreements that favored American interests while undermining the principles of fairness and equity in international trade. Ironically, the U.S. trade deficit—which Trump promised to fix—only worsened. In fact, by January 2025, it had surged to a record $131.4 billion. This highlights a fundamental misunderstanding: trade deficits are driven by macroeconomic factors, not tariffs or aggressive rhetoric.

Domestically, Trump portrayed the U.S. as a bastion of good governance even as his administration raised serious ethical concerns. His declaration of having “no conflicts of interest,” while appointing a cabinet of billionaires with extensive business entanglements, challenged long-standing norms of transparency and accountability. Yet much of the country remained indifferent—a sign, perhaps, of political fatigue or ideological polarization. Internationally, Trump became a caricature. In Italy, people quipped that he made Berlusconi look good. In Africa, some leaders noted he made even their dictators look dignified by comparison. These remarks, while humorous, revealed a sobering truth: the credibility of American leadership had been deeply damaged.

One of the most troubling legacies of Trump’s foreign policy is his disregard for the rule of law. His administration openly flouted international agreements and undermined institutions like the World Trade Organization. More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked his attempt to deport Venezuelan migrants using the Alien Enemies Act, citing violations of due process. In another case, the administration ignored a court order to bring back a wrongly deported Salvadoran man, sparking outrage among legal experts. These events signal a troubling trend: the erosion of legal norms at the very top of American government.

The global system, already under strain from populism, inequality, and climate change, relies on trust and shared norms. When the most powerful country signals that rules are optional and only apply when convenient, the foundations of cooperation begin to crumble. It also leaves weaker nations exposed to coercion, as multilateral protections break down.

The world after Trump is a more fragmented one. Alliances have been tested, global institutions weakened, and the U.S.'s moral authority diminished. Yet this rupture also presents an opportunity—for other nations to step up, for new coalitions to emerge, and for a more equitable model of globalization to take shape. If America hopes to reclaim any semblance of global leadership, it must begin with humility, rebuild trust through consistency, and recommit to the values that once made it a guiding force in the world—not just through strength, but through cooperation, fairness, and a respect for the rule of law.

The post-Trump era is not just about a shift in policy. It’s about restoring credibility in a world that is watching, wary, and waiting.

川普後時代的全球化

在川普總統任期結束後的今天,世界正試圖重整因其政策而破碎的全球秩序。全球化雖然仍在運行,但其核心價值與領導力量已發生根本性的變化。無論人們對川普的國內政策抱持何種看法,都無法否認他對全球體系造成了深遠而持久的影響。

美國曾經是文化魅力、民主理想與全球領導力的象徵,而如今其「軟實力」已大幅削弱。若說布希政府揭示了軍事「硬實力」的侷限,那麼川普則徹底摧毀了美國透過尊重與敬佩所建立的「軟實力」。創造「軟實力」概念的學者奈伊(Joseph Nye)近期指出,川普削減文化外交項目、政治干預美國之音等行徑,已嚴重損害美國作為榜樣的吸引力。

川普的外交政策是赤裸裸的交易式操作。「美國優先」不再只是一句口號,而是行動指南。他放棄多邊合作的精神,轉而採取雙邊談判策略,刻意利用權力不對等來迫使貧窮或弱小國家接受不平等條件。然而,川普誓言要解決的美國貿易赤字問題,並未因此改善。事實上,截至2025年1月,美國貿易逆差反創歷史新高,達到1,314億美元,顯示他對貿易失衡的理解根本錯誤。貿易逆差的根本原因在於國家的儲蓄率與財政赤字,而非關稅或激進手段。

在國內,川普自詡為良好治理的典範,卻在其億萬富翁內閣中充斥明顯的利益衝突。他聲稱任內毫無利益衝突,卻同時任命與全球商業緊密相關的人士擔任高官。令人遺憾的是,美國社會對此似乎無動於衷,也許是政治疲勞,也許是黨派對立令人麻木。

在世界舞台上,川普更成了娛樂與嘲諷的對象。在義大利,人們調侃「川普讓貝魯斯柯尼看起來很優秀」。在非洲,一些人說「川普讓我們的獨裁者都顯得有品味了」。這些幽默的評論其實透露出一個殘酷的現實:美國的國際領導力與道德權威正面臨瓦解。

更令人擔憂的是,川普對國際法的公然輕視。他無視既有協議,挑戰世界貿易組織的裁決,宣示「只在有利時才遵守規則」。2025年,美國最高法院阻止他援引《敵國外國人法》大規模驅逐委內瑞拉難民,指其違反正當程序;另一案中,川普政府無視法院命令,拒絕將一名遭誤遣返的薩爾瓦多男子送回美國,引發司法界譁然。這些事件突顯出政府高層對法治原則的漠視。

全球秩序本已因民粹主義、不平等與氣候危機而岌岌可危,如今更因美國這一強權無視規則而動搖。當最有權力的國家宣布「規則只適用於他人,不適用於自己」,合作的基石便開始崩解,弱國也將因此暴露於強權壓迫之下。

後川普時代的世界更加破碎:同盟關係遭受考驗,國際組織力量減弱,美國的道德領導地位搖搖欲墜。然而,這場破裂也帶來機會——其他國家有機會挺身而出,新興聯盟有機會孕育而生,更公平的全球化模式有機會誕生。

但若美國希望重新贏得全球信任,必須從謙遜開始,透過一致性重建信譽,並重新承諾那些曾使其成為全球領導者的價值觀——不是靠威脅與壓力,而是靠合作、公平與對法治的尊重。

後川普時代的挑戰,不僅是政策轉變的問題,更是信譽重建的問題。在這個充滿觀望、戒心與期盼的世界中,我們每個人都有責任為未來發聲。讓我們大聲說出:拒絕恐懼,拒絕虛假的經濟政策,拒絕關稅驅動的未來,拒絕一切以犧牲全球信任為代價的短視做法。

未來,不屬於嗓門最大的人,而屬於願意搭橋、而不是燒橋的人。

Why People Don’t Change Until They Feel It

When organizations talk about change, they often start with strategy decks, new structures, revised cultures, and updated systems. Leaders gather data, analyze trends, and craft well-reasoned transformation plans. But despite all that effort, real change rarely sticks. Why? Because it misses the mark on what matters most—people.

At the heart of every successful transformation is a shift in human behavior. And human behavior doesn’t change because of logic alone. It changes when people feel something deep enough to move them. The truth is, even in the most analytical, data-obsessed environments—even among the sharpest MBAs—it’s emotion that sparks action, not spreadsheets.

The most powerful change doesn’t begin with analysis. It begins with a moment of clarity. A moment when someone sees the problem in a new light, feels its urgency, and suddenly knows: “Something has to change.” That’s the spark that ignites real momentum. You don’t convince someone to marry with tax benefits or lower rent—you move them with love, with conviction, with purpose. The same goes for change in organizations.

And that’s why crisis, though painful, is often the greatest catalyst. When fear, anxiety, or even a sense of despair takes hold, people become willing to let go of the habits that once served them but now hold them back. As a Harvard Business School professor once put it: “In the absence of a pressing crisis, people will keep doing what they’ve always done.” That’s human nature. We cling to comfort until discomfort becomes impossible to ignore.

So, if you're a leader driving transformation, don’t just ask for new processes or present another report. Paint the picture of what’s at stake. Create urgency—not by fear alone, but by showing what could be lost and what could be gained. Connect people emotionally to the mission. Make them feel the cost of standing still and the possibility that lies ahead.

Because change is never just about plans, systems, or strategy. It’s about belief. It’s about hope. It’s about lighting a fire inside people that says: “We can do better. We must do better. And it starts with me.”

Real transformation doesn’t come from the head. It comes from the heart. And when you speak to the heart, people move.

為什麼人們非得有所感受才會改變

當組織談論變革時,往往從策略簡報、新的架構、調整後的文化與升級的系統開始。領導者蒐集數據、分析趨勢,並設計出合理的轉型計畫。但儘管投入了這麼多心力,真正的改變卻很少能持續下去。為什麼?因為他們忽略了最關鍵的元素──人。

每一場成功的轉型背後,都有一個共同的核心:人類行為的改變。而人類的行為,並不僅僅因為邏輯推理而改變。它會在內心被某種深刻的感受觸動時,才真正產生轉變。即使是在最重視數據分析、最講求理性推論的環境中──即便是那些最頂尖的 MBA 畢業生──真正驅動行動的從來都不是試算表,而是情感。

最有力量的改變,並非始於分析,而是源自一個清晰的瞬間。一個讓人重新看見問題本質的時刻,一個讓人感受到迫切性的時刻,一個讓人心中油然而生「非改不可」的時刻。那正是點燃真正行動動力的火花。你不會因為節稅或房租更便宜而說服一個人結婚;你會因為愛、信念與人生的意義打動對方。在組織裡也是一樣的道理。

這也是為什麼,儘管令人痛苦,危機往往是最強大的催化劑。當恐懼、焦慮,甚至是絕望籠罩時,人們才會願意放下過去那些曾經帶來成功,但如今卻成為阻礙的習慣。正如哈佛商學院一位教授所言:「在沒有迫切危機的情況下,人們會繼續按照他們習慣的方式做事。」這就是人性。我們總是緊抓著熟悉與舒適,直到不舒服的程度讓我們再也無法忽視。

因此,如果你是領導變革的人,不要只是要求新的流程或再交出一份報告。請描繪出局勢的真相,創造出一種緊迫感──不只是訴諸恐懼,更要展現不改變會失去什麼,以及改變後能獲得什麼。讓人們在情感上與使命連結。讓他們真正「感受」到停滯的代價,以及前方機會的可貴。

因為變革,從來都不只是計畫、系統或策略的問題。它關乎信念、關乎希望,更關乎在每個人心中點燃那把火──那把說著「我們可以做得更好,我們必須做得更好,而這一切,從我開始」的火。

真正的轉型,從來不是從頭腦開始,而是從心開始。當你觸動人心時,行動自然隨之而來。

Change Yourself to Become a Better Decision-Maker

In April 2025, the global financial markets were rocked by a sharp and sudden downturn. The S&P 500 plunged nearly 5%—its worst single-day drop in years—while the Dow Jones tumbled over 1,600 points. The cause? A wave of new tariffs abruptly announced by Donald Trump’s administration, including a blanket 10% tax on all imports and steeper penalties on goods from key trading partners like China, Japan, and the European Union. Within hours, China retaliated with a 34% tariff on U.S. goods, igniting fears of a global trade war and deepening economic uncertainty.

It was a stark reminder of what happens when decisions are made not from facts, data, and consultation—but from bias, ideology, and political theater. The administration ignored expert warnings, economic forecasts, and long-term repercussions. This wasn’t leadership—it was ego-driven showmanship masquerading as strength.

Reflecting on my MBA journey, one lesson stands out more than any other: good decisions must be grounded in facts and a scientific approach. Theories and models are important, but more crucial is a mindset that respects evidence, seeks truth, and invites challenge. History backs this up—repeatedly.

Take 19th-century medicine, for example. Surgeons once dismissed the idea of handwashing, even when clear data showed it drastically reduced infections. The resistance wasn’t because they lacked intelligence—it was because they lacked humility. A small act could have saved millions of lives, but change was delayed by arrogance. Just like that, even the best and brightest can fail when they ignore data and cling to outdated beliefs.

This brings us to the heart of the issue: if you decide now to design a decision-making architecture for your team or company, there is one more thing you must change—yourself. More specifically, your self-image and how you present yourself as a decision-maker.

A decision-maker isn’t just someone who picks a direction. They inspire others to follow it. Decision-making and leadership are inseparable—and leadership, in the end, is in the eye of the beholder. There is no such thing as a leader without followers. To be seen as a leader, others must believe in your leadership.

We’ve been conditioned to associate leadership with decisiveness, boldness, and unwavering confidence. As psychologist Gary Klein noted, John Wayne became the archetype of leadership in popular culture—the stoic cowboy who sizes up the situation and declares, “Here’s what we’re going to do.” No hesitation, no discussion, just action.

But this image is more dangerous than it is inspiring.

The “cowboy” style leader prides themselves on intuition and experience, avoids self-doubt, and sees input from others as weakness. They suppress dissent, foster groupthink, and make decisions in echo chambers. And the results? Chaotic policy. Unnecessary risk. Fragile systems built on sand.

We’ve seen this play out—not just in politics, but in boardrooms and startups, too. The best decision-making techniques run against this grain. Effective leaders today encourage diverse viewpoints, embrace uncertainty, and are willing to change their minds. That doesn’t make them weak—it makes them wise.

Of course, balancing openness during deliberation with full commitment during execution is no easy feat. As Eric Schmidt once said, the formula is “diverse perspectives and a deadline.” Amazon follows a similar philosophy: “Disagree and commit.” You challenge ideas when it’s time to decide—and once the choice is made, you commit with everything you’ve got.

That requires a shift in how we see leadership. We need to let go of outdated myths and embrace a new model—one where leadership is defined not by bravado, but by process and purpose. Look at successful CEOs who value collaboration and rigorous decision architecture. They don't pretend to have all the answers. Instead, they build teams, systems, and cultures that produce the best answers together. They own the decision, yes—but they know the power lies in the process.

Jim Collins called this the Level 5 Leader—someone who combines deep humility with fierce resolve. They are driven, passionate, and relentless in pursuit of results, but also deeply grounded and self-aware. These leaders are rare—but they exist. And they don’t look anything like John Wayne or Donald Trump.

Instead, they look a little more like Odysseus. When faced with the Sirens in Homer’s Odyssey, Odysseus didn’t trust his instincts. He knew he would be tempted. So he instructed his crew to plug their ears and tie him to the mast. He handed control to his team, trusting the system he’d built over his own momentary impulses. He survived—not because he was the strongest, but because he was the most thoughtful.

That’s leadership. That’s decision-making done right.

We need fewer cowboys and more architects—leaders who design sound processes, seek diverse input, and ground decisions in truth. Leaders who act with courage and humility. Leaders who aren’t afraid to say, “I don’t know yet—but together, we’ll find the best path forward.”

So if you want to change your team, change your company, and change your outcomes—start by changing yourself.

Make decisions with clarity. Lead with humility. Inspire with integrity. Because that’s how we make better choices. And that’s how we lead—forward.

改變自己,成為更優秀的決策者

2025 年 4 月,全球金融市場遭遇了劇烈且突如其來的下跌。標普 500 指數重挫近 5%,創下多年來單日最大跌幅,道瓊工業指數也大跌超過 1,600 點。原因來自川普政府突如其來地宣布一系列新關稅政策,包括對所有進口商品徵收 10% 的統一稅率,並對來自中國、日本與歐盟等主要貿易夥伴的商品加重懲罰性關稅。數小時內,中國迅速反擊,對美國商品徵收 34% 的報復性關稅,引發全球貿易戰的擔憂,進一步加劇經濟不確定性。

這次事件無疑是一記當頭棒喝,提醒我們:當決策並非出於事實、數據與專業諮詢,而是根植於偏見、意識形態與政治戲碼時,將會帶來多麼嚴重的後果。這層層錯誤的決策無視專家警告、經濟預測與長期衝擊,與其說是領導,不如說是被自我驅動的表演,假裝成力量的象徵。

回顧我在攻讀 MBA 的過程中,有一個觀念讓我特別深刻:良好的決策,必須建立在事實與科學方法之上。理論與模型固然重要,但更關鍵的是一種尊重證據、追求真理、樂於接受挑戰的思維模式。歷史不斷證明這一點。

舉例來說,在 19 世紀的醫學界,許多外科醫生曾經拒絕洗手這個簡單的舉動,儘管已有明確數據顯示洗手可以大幅減少感染與死亡。當時他們的抗拒不是因為缺乏知識,而是因為缺乏謙遜。一個微小的行為本可拯救數百萬條生命,卻因為傲慢而延誤多年。這正說明了,即使是最聰明的人,若無視數據、緊抓過時觀念,也會做出錯誤的決定。

這也回到今天的主題:如果你現在下定決心為你的團隊或公司設計一套決策架構,那麼還有一件更重要的事需要改變——那就是你自己。更準確地說,是你對自己的認知,以及你呈現給他人作為決策者的形象。

一位決策者,不只是那個拍板定案的人。他必須能夠激勵他人跟隨行動。決策與領導密不可分——而領導力的判斷,終究掌握在他人眼中。沒有追隨者,就不存在所謂的領導者。要讓他人相信你是領導者,你首先必須被他們視為領導者。

然而,我們長期以來被灌輸的領導印象,卻與有效決策背道而馳。我們習慣將領導力與果斷、大膽、絕對自信畫上等號。心理學家 Gary Klein 曾指出,好萊塢塑造的約翰·韋恩(John Wayne)式人物,成了大眾對領導者的典型印象——那個沉著冷靜的牛仔,一語定方向,眾人隨之而行。沒有猶豫,沒有討論,只有行動。

然而,這種形象比激勵人心更具危險性。

這類「牛仔型」領導者仰賴直覺與經驗,避免表現出自我懷疑,也不樂於接受他人意見。他們壓抑異議聲音,助長集體盲思,在同溫層中做出決策。其結果是什麼?政策混亂、風險升高、體系脆弱。

這樣的情況,不只出現在政壇,也發生在董事會與新創公司中。而真正優秀的決策方式,往往正與這種典型背道而馳。現代領導者應鼓勵多元觀點、擁抱不確定性,並願意在需要時改變主意。這不是軟弱,而是智慧的表現。

當然,在開放討論與果斷執行之間取得平衡,從來不容易。正如 Eric Schmidt 所說:「多元觀點,加上一個期限。」Amazon 的領導原則之一是:「提出異議,但一旦決定就全力以赴。」該辯論時就充分辯論,但一旦做出決策,每個人都應全力支持、專注執行。

這樣的領導力,需要我們徹底改變對領導的認知。我們必須拋棄那種「領導就是英雄」的神話,擁抱一種全新的典範——一種建立在流程、價值觀與集體智慧之上的領導模式。看看那些真正成功的 CEO,他們重視協作,重視嚴謹的決策架構。他們不假裝自己擁有所有答案,而是建立起團隊、系統與文化,讓最好的答案能夠自然浮現。他們為決策負責,卻深知力量來自於整體的過程。

Jim Collins 稱這樣的領袖為「第五級領導者」——在堅定執行力與謙遜人格之間取得完美平衡。他們堅毅、有熱情、全力以赴,但同時也腳踏實地、極富自覺。這樣的領袖雖然稀少,但他們真實存在。而他們的樣貌,與約翰·韋恩或唐納·川普完全不同。

如果一定要找個榜樣,那不如學學荷馬筆下的奧德修斯(Odysseus)。當他面對迷惑人心的賽蓮(Sirens)時,他不相信自己的意志能夠抵擋誘惑。他選擇信任流程,命令水手封住耳朵,並把自己綁在桅杆上。他將決策權交給團隊,相信自己設計的系統比一時衝動來得可靠。他得以生還,不是因為他最強,而是因為他最有遠見。

這才是真正的領導力,這才是正確的決策方式。

這個時代需要的不再是牛仔,而是建築師——那些設計穩健流程、蒐集多元觀點、以真相為根基的領導者。他們勇敢又謙遜,他們不怕承認「我現在還不知道」,因為他們相信:「我們一起,一定能找到最好的方向。」

所以,如果你希望改變你的團隊、改變你的公司、改變你的未來——就先從改變自己開始。

用清晰做決策,用謙遜帶領團隊,用誠信鼓舞人心。 因為,這才是做出更好選擇的起點。 而這,就是領導——向前的力量。

The Power of Writing

There was a time in my life when everything felt like it was falling apart. I was heartbroken, overwhelmed, and lost. When my girlfriend broke up with me, it wasn’t just the end of a relationship—it was the collapse of everything I had built emotionally around that connection. Friends tried to help, but none truly understood the storm I was facing inside. I felt like I was drowning in silence.

Then, by what felt like fate, I came across the work of Jordan Peterson. His words cut through the noise. He spoke of the importance of taking responsibility for your suffering, confronting chaos with courage, and most practically—writing. He didn’t describe journaling as a fluffy, feel-good habit. He framed it as a disciplined act of self-confrontation, a way to explore truth and rebuild meaning in life.

So, I picked up a pen. At first, I simply poured out my thoughts—raw, unfiltered, emotional. I wrote about the breakup, my insecurities, my regrets, and my fears. And something unexpected happened: the more I wrote, the lighter I felt. The pages became a mirror reflecting not just pain, but strength I didn’t know I had. I wasn't just coping—I was healing.

It turns out, change doesn’t always come from monumental, sweeping actions. We often think we need to overhaul our lives in one grand gesture to move forward. But the truth? Real transformation begins with tiny tweaks. A journal entry. A five-minute walk. A conscious breath before reacting. These small shifts, when repeated with intention, create powerful momentum. And when these tweaks are aligned with our values, they can lead to lasting, life-altering change.

Think of a gymnast—graceful, powerful, balanced. What makes her capable of performing such impossible routines? Her core. When she wobbles, it’s her core strength that brings her back. Life is no different. When we face challenges, it's our mental and emotional core—our mindset, habits, and self-awareness—that keeps us steady. But to build that strength, we must step out of our comfort zones and attempt the hard things. That’s where growth lives.

Sarah Blakely, the founder of Spanx and a self-made billionaire, shared a beautiful story: every night, her father would ask her, “How did you fail today?” Not because he wanted her to feel ashamed, but because he wanted her to see failure as a sign of courage—proof she was trying, risking, growing. That mindset is a gift. What if we all saw our failures not as flaws, but as badges of effort? What if we praised ourselves for showing up, for trying, for daring?

So often, what holds us back isn’t the world—it’s the story we tell ourselves. “I’ll freeze at that party.” “I’m not good enough for that job.” “They’re all more successful than me.” These are just stories. They feel real, but they’re not truth. They’re fear in disguise. And the longer we believe them, the further they pull us from who we really are.

In emergencies—fires, plane crashes—many people tragically die because they stick to familiar routes, trying to escape the way they entered. They can’t adapt. They can’t see a new path. And isn’t that how we sometimes respond to emotional crises too? Clinging to old beliefs, old patterns, old versions of ourselves—even when they no longer serve us.

But there’s a way out. It starts with awareness. With reflection. With writing.

James Pennebaker, a leading researcher on expressive writing, discovered that when people write about their deepest emotions, their mental and physical health improves dramatically. Lower anxiety. Better immunity. Fewer doctor visits. More meaningful relationships. Why? Because writing helps us make sense of what feels senseless. It gives shape to the chaos. It turns pain into perspective.

I didn’t know it at the time, but when I sat down to write after my breakup, I was doing something powerful. I was reclaiming my voice. I was rewriting the narrative. And over time, one page at a time, I began to rise.

We all carry stories—some are heavy, others unfinished. But the pen is in your hand. You get to choose what comes next. So don’t wait for life to fix itself. Start small. Start honest. Start with a single page.

Write. Reflect. Grow. Heal. And most importantly—keep going.

書寫的力量

曾經,我的人生彷彿一片瓦解。那時的我,心碎、崩潰、迷失。當女朋友和我分手時,那不僅是一段關係的結束,更像是我情感世界整個支撐架構的倒塌。朋友們試著安慰我,但沒有人真正明白我內心正經歷的風暴。我感覺自己像是溺水者,被沉默吞沒。

就像命運安排的一樣,我接觸到了喬登·彼得森(Jordan Peterson)的著作。他的話語穿透了我內心的混亂。他談論人們需要為自己的痛苦負責、勇敢面對混沌,最實際的一點——去書寫。他從不把寫日記描述成一種柔軟、感覺良好的習慣,而是一種自我對話的紀律行動,是探索真相與重建人生意義的方式。

於是,我拿起筆。一開始,我只是傾瀉內心的想法——真實、未經修飾、充滿情緒。我寫下這段分手經歷、我的不安、我的遺憾與恐懼。然後,一件出乎意料的事情發生了:我寫得越多,心情就越輕盈。這些頁面成了我的一面鏡子,不只映照出我的傷痛,也讓我看見了內在的力量——是我從未意識到的力量。我不只是努力撐住,我正在療癒。

事實證明,改變不一定得來自巨大的劇變。我們常以為,想要前進,得一次性徹底改造整個人生。但真相是,真正的轉變來自於微小的調整。一篇日記、一段五分鐘的散步、一個在反應前的深呼吸。當這些小小的舉動成為習慣,並與我們的價值觀一致時,它們就能累積出驚人的力量,並帶來深遠的改變。

想像一位體操選手——優雅、有力、穩定。她之所以能完成近乎不可能的動作,是因為她擁有強大的核心力量。當她失衡時,正是這個核心讓她重新穩住。人生亦然。當我們面對挑戰,真正支撐我們的,是我們的心智與情緒核心——我們的思維方式、習慣,以及自我覺察。而要建立這份穩定,我們必須走出舒適圈,挑戰困難。成長,就藏在那裡。

Spanx 創辦人、自力更生的億萬富翁莎拉·布蕾克利(Sarah Blakely)曾分享一段動人的故事:每天晚餐時,她的父親都會問她:「你今天是怎麼失敗的?」他這麼問,不是為了讓她羞愧,而是為了讓她明白,失敗是一種勇氣的象徵——證明她有在嘗試、有在冒險、有在成長。這樣的思維模式,是一份珍貴的禮物。如果我們都能這樣看待失敗呢?不是缺陷,而是努力的勳章。我們能不能學著為自己的嘗試喝采,為自己的勇氣鼓掌?

其實,真正讓我們止步不前的,往往不是外在的世界,而是我們腦中那個不斷自我懷疑的聲音:「我在派對上一定會冷場」、「我根本不夠格拿到那份工作」、「他們的人生都比我精彩多了」……這些,都是故事。它們聽起來真實,卻不是真理。它們只是偽裝成邏輯的恐懼。當我們越相信這些故事,就越遠離真正的自己。

在緊急情況下——火災、墜機——很多人不幸喪命,並不是因為沒有出口,而是因為他們太過依賴原路逃生。他們無法靈活應變,看不見其他選項。我們在人生的情緒危機中,何嘗不是如此?我們固守著舊有的信念、模式、甚至是舊版本的自己,即便這些早已不再適用。

但,總有一條路能通往出口。起點是覺察,是反思,是書寫。

表達性書寫研究先驅詹姆斯·潘尼貝克(James Pennebaker)發現,當人們寫下內心最深層的情緒時,他們的心理與身體健康都會明顯改善。焦慮減少,免疫力提升,看醫生的次數減少,人際關係也變得更加深刻。為什麼?因為書寫讓我們能夠理解那些看似毫無意義的混亂,它為痛苦賦予結構,讓混亂化為清晰。

我當時並不知道,分手後坐下來寫字的那一刻,我做的是一件多麼強大的事情。我重新找回了自己的聲音,開始重寫屬於自己的故事。時間一頁一頁地流過,我漸漸走出了陰霾。

我們每個人都背負著不同的故事——有些沉重,有些未完。但筆,就在你手中。接下來的章節,由你來決定。所以,別再等待命運安排。從一個小行動開始,從一份誠實開始,從一頁紙開始。

書寫。反思。成長。療癒。最重要的是——繼續前行。